I was nursing a hot chocolate in a small café beneath one of
the North Yorkshire peaks when someone told me that Margaret Thatcher had
died. There were no rumblings in
the nearby mountains, no lighting strikes and the rain didn’t stop falling, but
it was possible nonetheless to feel a sense of the profound. We all of us, after all, live in a
country whose political environment she has largely ordered, and the acres of
print and online commentary which followed the announcement of her death was
all produced by men and women whose own political outlook was shaped by
her. We are all Children of
Thatcher. Progressives and
reactionaries, lovers and haters, nationalists and internationalists, we have
all had our political consciousness defined by the woman whose funeral
procession will move along the Strand and Fleet Street and up to St Paul’s this
morning. It is an extraordinary
reflection of her impact. Just as
politics seemed to be retreating into blandness, and fewer people want to be
bothered with political argument, it all comes flooding back. Thanks to her.
My own earliest political memories and actions are to do
with the Lady. I canvassed for
her, as a member of a relatively political family, in 1979; rejoiced in her
triumph at a preternaturally early age on that sunny May day; went on to join the
Young Conservatives where Thatcher would be greeted by enthusiastic ovations on
the last day of the national conference, even while it was in the hands of some
distinctly non-Thatcherite Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen. And even when I started to move away
from the Thatcherite creed, I never doubted – no one did – the impact of this
woman who had taken Britain by the scruff of the neck in 1979 and sought to
re-boot it. Meeting her in person
was a defining moment, even if she did spend some time attacking the profession
– teaching – that I had recently joined.
But then that was – and is – the point about Margaret Thatcher. She had no time for false niceties. She was blunt in her opinions and her
actions, in the black and white world she looked upon, and she expected others
to be the same.
There is an irony in the Ding Dong brigade being so
triumphalist. You can sing Ding
Dong Socialism’s dead. Or
Communism. Or militant trade
unionism. And you’d be right in
those instances. Indeed, if you
really must, you can remind everyone via a 1930s Munchkin song that the Lady
herself is dead. But her ideas
aren’t. Her legacy isn’t. Enjoy the song while you can, you
preening lefties, for Thatcherism has survived everything you sought to
protect.
But of course, she also managed to destroy One Nation
Conservatism, the creed of this very blog. She gave it lip service, commenting that “We must learn
again to be one nation, otherwise we shall end up as no nation”, but that
wasn’t really a commitment to what we understand as One Nation
Conservatism. She was as happy to
spell the end of a brand of conservatism that she considered weak and
inarticulate as she was the trade unionism which had halted much of Britain in
the months before her march on power.
Yet even for us, the last remaining outpost of old Toryism, her death is
an event to provoke respect and to stimulate reflection.
Why should we respect her? Why should we draw ourselves to mark her passing on this
funeral day? Because she is of a
rare breed. She is of a breed that
sees politics as a can-do vocation.
A breed that allows no obstacle to stand in the way of political
passion. A breed that comes to
political maturity at just the time they are needed, to change things, whether
through conflict or persuasion, because actually, the change is so very
needed. A breed that makes the
political world seem so much larger and so much more important because the
scale of their own thinking and activity is so monumental. We mark her passing because we know
very well that she will be one of only a handful of political leaders whose
name will remain part of the common currency of discussion and memory a century
or more hence. That is what makes
her passing worth marking.
When this day is done the passions won’t much die down, and
her name and legacy will still inspire furious argument on either side. But we will return to the sometimes
dead-ended politics of today and may occasionally wonder what could happen if
another person of the Lady’s ilk were to bestride the political nation
again. We might have some
nostalgia for a time when ideas really seemed to matter, or we might be
grateful for our less troublesome, more mediocre politicians. But we will know that the era to which
Margaret Thatcher gave her name was indeed an extraordinary one in the annals
of British politics. And we are
still living in its shadow.
2 comments:
"There were no rumblings in the nearby mountains, no lighting strikes and *the rain didn’t stop falling*"
I was with you on the day she died (albeit not immediately in your presence when you heard the news) and it was not raining, it did not rain at any point that day, nor did it rain at any point that week (with the exception of a short drizzle on Thursday).
Your barefaced lies undermine your entire blog post, please correct.
Interesting article. I thought at first that here was an article that was about to reflect on the late Mrs Thatcher's place in history. Unfortunately and in line with the politics of our times you have served up a masterpiece in blandness.
Sometimes you find that a prophet is not welcome in his/ her own town. Some thoughtful reflections on how the world view her achievements may help our hapless journalists come to terms with history.
Please wake up to the passing of a great leader, pay her due respect and homage for her utterly amazing achievements or get someone else to write it for you.
From a chap that lives in Yorkshire.
Post a Comment