The Clegg Dilemma

As the Lib Dems gather for their conference in Bournemouth, Nick Clegg is firmly setting out his stall as a rightist Liberal, or Orange Booker. He's been urging public sector spending cuts, and unambiguously said he would send his children to independent schools because the state sector is in such a poor state. I must confess I rather liked Clegg's chutzpah on the schools front, in refusing to use his children as political footballs and condemn them to poor schooling as a PR exercise. Nonetheless, his problem is all too clearly revealed by research undertaken by a group called 'Liberal Vision'. They suggest two-thirds of Liberal MPs could lose their seats, mainly to the Tories, in the next election.

The Liberal problem has always been that they have increased their Westminster representation at the expense of a weakened Tory party for the past decade, but failed to commit their voters to a new, distinctive Liberal position. They have grown rich on the soft pickings of a declining Tory party, but it was always going to be the case that once the Tories revived, their newly acquired seats would disappear back into the natural middle-class fold of the Tory Party. The Liberals look increasingly like the British political equivalent to the Eastern Europe nations between the wars - created when their powerful neighbours were weak, it was only a matter of time before a resurgent neighbour gobbled them back up.

The Liberals have functioned as a protest party for disillusioned, moderate Tories, and have in addition inherited Tory seats with apparently healthy majorities on the strength of low turnouts. A resurgent, moderate Tory party under Cameron means not only the potential return of some of the protest vote, but also the return to voting by the hitherto absent Tories. There is no easy way for Clegg to combat this. In fact, the real answer for the Liberals was probably to take advantage of New Labour's move into the centre ground under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown by seeking to colonise the left of the political spectrum more effectively. There are a huge number of disillusioned, disenfranchised voters in ghetto-ised urban areas which a genuinely radical Lib Dem party could have reached, creating a much stronger, more lasting majority for itself. Successive Liberal leaders simply failed to grasp this opportunity, and in choosing to follow the other two parties into the centre-right, they will reap the rewards of their callow opportunism at the next election.


Anonymous said…
Clegg said today though that he thinks there will be a lib dem government in Britain because 'New Labour is finished' and the tories are 'arrogant'. I can't see them ever winning an election on left wing policies because much of Britain is centre to centre-right, especially in regards to immigration and attitudes to Europe.
GM said…
The Britain that votes is centre-right. It is the substantial swathe of neglected voters who are so far not motivated enough to turn up to the polling booths who a radicalised Lib Dem party would be able to capture.

Popular posts from this blog

More Press Noise

Ministers Who Don't Resign

Lessons for Cameron from Denis Healey's "Greatness"